b***@horde.net
2011-03-20 20:00:31 UTC
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3602
--- Comment #1 from TJ Saunders <***@castaglia.org> 2011-03-20 16:00:28 EDT ---
I can see why Apache marks this feature as "experimental". By buffering up log
messages, the chances of interleaved log messages become a lot higher.
Especially if multiple log file directives are pointed at the same filesystem
path.
In addition, any such buffering would need to flush the pending log messages
based on the end-of-line (i.e. newline) boundaries, not on the optimal block
size for the underlying filesystem. Otherwise, the messages again risk being
interleaved.
--- Comment #1 from TJ Saunders <***@castaglia.org> 2011-03-20 16:00:28 EDT ---
I can see why Apache marks this feature as "experimental". By buffering up log
messages, the chances of interleaved log messages become a lot higher.
Especially if multiple log file directives are pointed at the same filesystem
path.
In addition, any such buffering would need to flush the pending log messages
based on the end-of-line (i.e. newline) boundaries, not on the optimal block
size for the underlying filesystem. Otherwise, the messages again risk being
interleaved.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.proftpd.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.proftpd.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.